Sujet : Re: What is a photon
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 05. Jun 2025, 13:41:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <eab2e0c2ee6c90069a8bf19695dc4049@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 9:24:35 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Mittwoch000004, 04.06.2025 um 10:39 schrieb Bertitaylor:
....
Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant: [...]
How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>
>
Speed of light has to be variant in the Copernican model. Light is a
wave. All waves need media to propagate. Light's medium is aether.
>
A bit confused, Bertietaylor?
>
Not at all.
>
The Copernican model is wrong, the Sun isn't the centre of the Universe.
And in 1543 Copernicus knew nothing about the speed of light.
>
The Sun is at the centre of the solar system, of which you may have
heard. The Earth goes around the Sun. The Sun and the planets do NOT go
around the Earth in crystal spheres. Where the stars are supposedly
light from Heaven casting their light through pricks on the crystal
spheres.
>
>
The solar system moves around the center of our home galaxy and this
galaxy around the center of our local super-cluster and that around what
only heaven knows.
>
So: everything moves!
>
BUT: we could use a simple trick and stop motion for at least the
observer.
Just not possible. Your observer may SEEM still but he is on a platform
that is moving.
>
>
This would make 'at rest' 'relative' and we could say, that all
observers are of equal rights, hence all observers are at rest. But they
are only at rest for themselves, while for any other they move.
Nobody can ve at rest. Even a snail is moving at 30km per sec around the
Sun.
>
This means essentially the same thing: everything moves.
Yes ja da oui with wohls on.
>
That's why the universe cannot have a center (because that center would
not move).
As the universe is infinite all points in the universe can be its
centre.
>
Also the so called 'big-bang' must be 'relative'.
None of that big bang bollocks, please.
>
This sounds strange and unsatisfying. But I don't think so, because it
is actually much easier to understand than current standard cosmology.
An infinite universe has to be eternal.
However stars go through multi trillion year cycles.
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
>
>
....
>
TH
--