Re: The Apollo moon landings

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: The Apollo moon landings
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics alt.usage.english
Suivi-à : sci.physics
Date : 09. Jun 2025, 18:01:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <qjgjhl-is9m.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-141-lowlatency (x86_64))
In sci.physics David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote:
Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
falling slowly.
 
When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is
determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from.  If you
measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height,
you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with
the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface.
 

True enough. However, all their time, and especially during the first
mission, was tightly scheduled and there was no item on the schedule to
perform hijinks.


--
penninojim@yahoo.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings3Jim Pennino
9 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2William Hyde
10 Jun 25  `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal