Re: What is a photon

Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 11:09 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 14.06.2025 09:07, skrev Thomas Heger:

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:27 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 13.06.2025 10:13, skrev Thomas Heger:

>
I meant, that 'speed of light' is actually an angle.
>
This angle is measured locally as velocity c.
>
In geometric terms it would be 45° and means the equality of two complex intervals called 'timelike' and 'spacelike'.
>
For any 'influence' (all sorts of interactions in a certain space with complex valued 'points', called 'spacetime') which fulfills this condition, we could use the term 'light speed'.
>
Now light falls into this cathegory as other em-waves, too.
>
Now we need to attatch an axis of time to any location and place the observer in the center of its local frame of reference, we could see, that the past light-cone of the observer is using this angle c, while the opposite means 'standstill' (actually 'relative standstill' in respect to the observer).
>
Now I called the comoving patters 'matter' and the inverse 'axis of time', hence matter and time are 'relative', too.
>
...
>
>
TH

>
>
I, the reader, don't understand this text, which according
to Thomas Heger is the author's fault.

>
No, to understand is the problem of the reader.

 But it is Einstein's fault that you don't understand his text?
 

>
The author's fault would be, if the text cannot be understood.
>
>

So could you please write an annotated version of this text,
where you point out the errors that make me fail to understand it?
>

sure
>
Please have a look at my 'book':
>
>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing

 This text cannot be understood. Your fault!
 

Well, that's actually not true, because the text contains also lots of pictures, which are in most cases very nice.
These pictures actually transport most of the content of my paper.
So: simply try to understand my illustrations.
TH