Re: Bertietaylor 's formula

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Suivi-à : sci.physics
Date : 01. Jul 2025, 21:35:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <octdjl-1vn1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-143-lowlatency (x86_64))
In sci.physics Paul.B.Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
Den 01.07.2025 02:01, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:23:07 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 
Den 30.06.2025 11:57, skrev Bertitaylor:
>
comprehend that we have posited that a neutron is a tight electron
proton.
>
β− decay is when a neutron in the core changes to a proton
by emitting an electron.
You claim that this proves that a neutron is a proton and
an electron in tight bond.
>
β+ decay is when a proton in the core changes to a neutron
by emitting a positron.
 
 
No such animal as a positron so it accepts an electron to become a
neutron.
 
OK. That settles it.
 
There is no way you can be unaware of the existence of the positron,
so you know you are denying facts.
 
That will make you a troll.
 

Well, no.

There is also the possibility that he has some mental issue that
prevents him from accepting a reality that conflicts with his conceptions.


--
penninojim@yahoo.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Jun01:11 * Bertietaylor 's formula29Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:20 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula6Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:55 i+* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:45 ii`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
2 Jul02:39 ii `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Python
2 Jul03:21 ii  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun02:04 i`- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:18 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula10Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:54 i+- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
30 Jun23:37 i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula8Bertitaylor
30 Jun23:39 i +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Bertitaylor
1 Jul04:29 i i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
1 Jul15:00 i i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Jim Pennino
1 Jul20:07 i i  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Jul00:50 i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
1 Jul10:33 i  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul10:05 i   `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:45 `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula12Jim Pennino
30 Jun10:57  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula11Bertitaylor
30 Jun14:56   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul02:38   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul21:35   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:55   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:47   +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:42   i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul03:11   i `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul03:24   `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul03:36    `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul04:45     `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal