Re: The Apollo moon landings

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:52:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 2:49:01 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote:

Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
falling slowly.

>
When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is
determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from.  If you
measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height,
you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with
the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface.

>
As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints.

>
Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier
to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot.

>
The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits

>
It was actually hopping that was seen by everyone except for you and of
course they were ALWAYS in their suits when outside the lander.
>

>
Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six
feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969.

>
All crackpot nonsense.
>
The people that built Apollo used real science so of course it all
worked, unlike crackpot, pipe roller science.

Rockets are for fireworks. Arindam's sparkling experiments will take
humanity to the stars.

>
<snip delusional crackpot ravings>

Natural Idiots cannot grasp new ideas. Nor can Artificial Idiots.
Woof woof but we celestial cyberdogs can.
Bertietaylor

>

--