Re: What is "local time"?

On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 19:02:29 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 19.10.2024 o 15:52, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:18:37 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 21:54, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:10:58 +0000, Python wrote:

>
Le 17/10/2024 à 17:00, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

>
See, poor idiot: after humans invent something
they usually give a name to it. One of their
abstract inventions got the name "time".

>
Trees have been named by humans, so Wozniak is claiming
that humans invented trees.

>
No, I don't.

>
Of course he claimed ...

Inserting the rest of the sentence that dishonest Wozniak
conivingly deleted

... that because it's a logical deduction of what he said.

No I didn't. Or - a quoting pls, poor lying piece of shit.

Obviously, Wozniak is completely ignorant of the implications
of his erratic assertions.

As for time -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_standard
you've got about 20 times mentioned in the
article. Point those which are parts of
nature.

>
Wozniak is still trying to conflate the philosophical
nature of time

>
Well, fuck your delusional "philosophical nature
of time", poor idiot.

So Wozniak admits defeat (that's what it means when one uses
profanity instead of cogent argument).

So, which, precisely,  of the times mentioned in the
article are  parts of nature. Let me guess - none
of them?

https://www.thecollector.com/philosophy-of-time/
The title is "The Philosophy of Time: Study the Nature of
Past, Present, and Future" and a section is "The Nature of
Time"
The very title has the NATURE of time in it :-))
Implying that the whole treatise is about time as nature.
Wozniak's guesses wrong, as usual.  And he deletes the most
damning examples I gave that naming something doesn't mean
it was a human invention:

I can give examples of millions of objects NOT invented
by humans [and named by humans].  For starters:
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_stars
>
Wozniak can't seem to admit that he could possibly be
wrong, even when buried by overwhelming disproof.
Information is not knowledge, and knowledge is not
wisdom.
>
“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are
proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides
to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami

Wozniak decides to go on being wrong after being presented
with millions of cases that disprove his assertion.  His
pride and arrogance are the only things greater than his
false assertions.