Re: Scalar waves

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Scalar waves
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 06. May 2024, 10:36:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1qt4uxc.1ww9zlwbxp17eN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:

On 05/05/2024 02:18 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
[-]
In mathematical logic, often there's something like a quantifier,
that there are explicit quantifiers, and implicit quantifiers.
>
So, sort of like dimensional analysis, is a quantifier analysis,
representing fixed or free parameters, and the implicitly
infinitely-many quantifiers, in front of a given classical
quantifier.
>
The quantities, are results of derivations, to represent measurables,
or the "real" and "virtual" quantities that result real quantities
that are measurables.
>
So, quantities are often results of infinite expressions and
thusly completions of infinite limits or continuum limits.
>
The dimensional analysis and what results the dimensionless,
gets into degrees of freedom as independent parameters, then
also gets into the implicits. The quantities are not purely
algebraic, yet ensconced in their derivations.
>
Consider the length of a body vis-a-vis the distance it
travels: both in units of length, yet distance as only
after a derivation of all the higher orders of acceleration
and deceleration whether it results a distance at rest, or,
a distance marking motion, that the other factors of the
dimensional analysis, go along with it, though algebraically,
at each point dimensionless.
>
Right. A system of dimensions is just a consistent mapping
of a system of equations into a finite-dimensional algebra,
>
Jan
>
 
 
It's more the point that classical mechanics has a richer
system of implicitly involved dimensions with regards to
the derivations of the equations or formulas of systems
of moving bodies and the dynamics of change, in the
orbifold of the orbits of the geodesy of moving bodies
their world-lines and trajectories, that length and
distance and metric and norm have separate derivational
attributes as systemic.

Again, your -has- is fundamentally wrong.
a dimension is a human construct,
it is not a property of a physical quantity,

Jan


Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Apr 24 * Scalar waves55Thomas Heger
28 Apr 24 `* Re: Scalar waves54Ross Finlayson
28 Apr 24  +- Re: Scalar waves1Dominick Csikós
28 Apr 24  +- Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson
29 Apr 24  `* Re: Scalar waves51Thomas Heger
29 Apr 24   `* Re: Scalar waves50Ross Finlayson
30 Apr 24    `* Re: Scalar waves49Thomas Heger
30 Apr 24     +* Re: Scalar waves6Thomas Heger
1 May 24     i`* Re: Scalar waves5Ross Finlayson
1 May 24     i +* Re: Scalar waves3Thomas Heger
1 May 24     i i`* Re: Scalar waves2J. J. Lodder
3 May 24     i i `- Re: Scalar waves1Thomas Heger
1 May 24     i `- Re: Scalar waves1J. J. Lodder
1 May 24     `* Re: Scalar waves42J. J. Lodder
1 May 24      +- Re: Scalar waves1Maciej Wozniak
3 May 24      `* Re: Scalar waves40Thomas Heger
4 May 24       +* Re: Scalar waves28Ross Finlayson
5 May 24       i+* Re: Scalar waves23Thomas Heger
5 May 24       ii+* Re: Scalar waves2Ross Finlayson
5 May 24       iii`- Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson
5 May 24       ii`* Re: Scalar waves20J. J. Lodder
6 May 24       ii `* Re: Scalar waves19Thomas Heger
6 May 24       ii  `* Re: Scalar waves18J. J. Lodder
6 May 24       ii   `* Re: Scalar waves17Mikko
6 May 24       ii    `* Re: Scalar waves16J. J. Lodder
7 May 24       ii     `* Re: Scalar waves15Thomas Heger
7 May 24       ii      +* Re: Scalar waves6J. J. Lodder
7 May 24       ii      i`* Re: Scalar waves5Maciej Wozniak
8 May 24       ii      i `* Re: Scalar waves4Thomas Heger
8 May 24       ii      i  `* Re: Scalar waves3J. J. Lodder
8 May 24       ii      i   +- Re: Scalar waves1Maciej Wozniak
9 May 24       ii      i   `- Re: Scalar waves1Thomas Heger
8 May 24       ii      `* Re: Scalar waves8Mikko
8 May 24       ii       `* Re: Scalar waves7J. J. Lodder
8 May 24       ii        `* Re: Scalar waves6Ross Finlayson
9 May 24       ii         `* Re: Scalar waves5Thomas Heger
9 May 24       ii          `* Re: Scalar waves4Ross Finlayson
9 May 24       ii           `* Re: Scalar waves3Ross Finlayson
10 May 24       ii            `* Re: Scalar waves2Thomas Heger
10 May 24       ii             `- Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson
5 May 24       i`* Re: Scalar waves4J. J. Lodder
6 May 24       i `* Re: Scalar waves3Ross Finlayson
6 May 24       i  `* Re: Scalar waves2J. J. Lodder
6 May 24       i   `- Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson
5 May 24       `* Re: Scalar waves11J. J. Lodder
6 May 24        `* Re: Scalar waves10Thomas Heger
6 May 24         `* Re: Scalar waves9J. J. Lodder
6 May 24          `* Re: Scalar waves8Ollis Kalakos
7 May 24           `* Re: Scalar waves7Thomas Heger
7 May 24            `* Re: Scalar waves6Parkis Escarrà
8 May 24             `* Re: Scalar waves5Thomas Heger
8 May 24              `* Re: Scalar waves4Tamerlane Oldfart Lefévre
11 May 24               `* Re: Scalar waves3Thomas Heger
11 May 24                `* Re: Scalar waves2Ross Finlayson
12 May 24                 `- Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal