Re: heating a cap

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: heating a cap
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 05. Oct 2024, 16:03:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <dok2gj1ob49lt7b9v9s3dlgbl0k5mpus60@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 05 Oct 2024 06:45:40 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 04 Oct 2024 22:15:50 -0700) it happened john larkin
<JL@gct.com> wrote in <8qi1gj5d27uqdkudv6vfql0fcv273mjcve@4ax.com>:
>
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 23:50:36 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:31:13 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 12:10:38 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>
On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 16:36:24 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
I got a small (under 1" long) aluminum electro cap, 220 uF 63v, and
cranked up the voltage. It started drawing a bunch of current at 105
volts, got hot, and folded back to 80 mA at 87v.
>
It got too hot to touch in a couple of minutes, after roughly 500
joules. Freeze spray let it go back up to 100 volts or so.
>
None of that seemed to damage it, so an electrolytic cap sort of has a
built-in MOV.
>
You're not 'heating a cap'.
>
Felt hot to me.
>
>
You're applying voltage overstress to failure, using a
current limited source.
>
But it didn't fail.
>
>
This tells you precisely nothing.
>
Told me a lot. Why elect to not learn things?
>
>
Were you earing safety glasses?
>
No earrings, and my normal glasses.
>
>
Are you sure you want to advertize this increasingly
erratic behavior?
>
Experimenting with parts is admittedly a bizarre thing for an engineer
to do. Sorry.
>
Legg seems to have a problem on the groups with anyone who isn't an
out-and-out Commie. Just ignore him.
>
There's no reason to not destroy parts. They don't have feelings.
>
How do you know, have you been once?
>
BTW I did test some parts out of spec..
But many problems come from aging with electrolytic caps.
My old Samsung TV lasted 20 years... on many hours a day.
So good electrolytics do exist.
Just designing a bit below maximum specs may help.

I know people who are terrified of running parts anywhere near abs
max. I run some parts at 2x abs max voltage or power. Pushing parts is
the way to get performance, especially speed. Some work fine at 4x.

Test them, blow up a few, define your own abs max. But only when there
is a big payoff.

I'm pushing a lot of HMC659's (15 GHz distributed amplifiers) to about
2x voltage. It's intimidating to test them to destruction because they
cost over $300 each.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal