Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 26. Mar 2024, 05:43:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uttjpg$1jptr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/25/2024 5:04 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 3/25/2024 6:11 PM, WM wrote:
Le 25/03/2024 à 20:38, Jim Burns a écrit :
 
[...]
>
You cannot add a natural number to ℕ.
 You cannot add a natural number to ℕ ==
ℕ holds all sizes of sets for which
changing by one element changes the set's size.
The set of odd numbers is infinite. There are an infinite number of natural numbers. infinity = infinity. Density is another matter.
.01->.001 can represent infinity... Its denser, so to speak.

 ℕ doesn't have any of those sizes.
 ℕ isn't a set for which
changing by one element changes the set's size.
 
But a bijection of ℕ with |E = {2, 4, 6, ...}
would prove that both sets have
the same number of elements.
 ℕ and 𝔼 aren't sets for which
changing by one element changes the set's size.
 
Adding an element to |E destroys this state
 1 ⟼ 2
n ⟼ n+2
𝔼∪{1} ⇉ 𝔼
 
and shows ℕ is larger than ℕ.
Contradiction!
 | CAESAR (recovering his self-possession):
| Pardon him, Theodotus:
| he is a barbarian, and thinks that
| the customs of his tribe and island are
| the laws of nature.
|
George Bernard Shaw, "Caesar and Cleopatra" (1898)
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal