Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Le 15/07/2024 à 15:11, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :French again. Translated by Google:Den 15.07.2024 14:23, skrev Richard Hachel:The real speed of your proton (not the one you measure) is therefore Vr=6947c.Why so many words to give the simple answer:
Your theory predicts that the real speed of
the proton in the LHC is 6947c.
You failed to answer the second question.
"What is the measured speed of the protons in the LHC?"
You know the answer.
The real speed of the protons is measured to be less than c.
So since the predicted speed is different from
the measured speed, your theory is falsified.
You are deliberately confusing Vo and Vr.The physicists at CERN are measuring the speed
Vo is what we measure in the laboratory with clocks placed in different locations.
The same clock, placed at the start and finish of a large circular circuit, is not, in relativity, one and the same clock.See? Hilarious, no?
These are two clocks, placed in two different places and separated by the distance of the circuit, even if they have been "fused" into one.
The only reality is the time measured by a watch thatSo you claim that we must know the protons proper time per
could be attached to the proton, and which would give the proper time in the proton's frame of reference, because it always remains in the same place in its frame of reference (accelerated or not). This is not the case for the laboratory reference frame, which measures a very “jumpy” proton.
Please note: the real speed is measured in the LAB reference frame.Yes, of course!
The theory of relativity is full of little traps, and the idea that the real speed is in the reference frame of the proton, since we use its own time, is a very powerful trap.Who fell in this trap?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.