On 03/11/2024 08:30 AM, gharnagel wrote:
Volney wrote:
>
On 3/11/2024 10:01 AM, gharnagel wrote:
>
Athel wrote:
>
"Doctor" Hachel, who still keeps the source of his "doctorate" a
secret.
>
Hasn't it been mentioned on the old board that he is a medical doctor?
>
Under a different name. (Lengrand)
>
Nope.
>
And what "old board"?
>
The dearly departed google groups sci.physics.relativity
>
Seems that it was mentioned that they were glad that he wasn't treating
them.
Yeah you know there was a real bad cold going around, ....
That said, when you consider the Aspect-type experiments
which invoke the notion of the photino, and otherwise
"the flux complement of supersymmetry in full-velocity flux,
as a theoretical particle because particle physics",
about Alain Aspect and J.S. Bell, whether or not it's an
otherwise nonsensical person bring these to your attention,
they still are as so and it would be foolish to let oneself
be deluded by the straw-man fallacy, which is usually enough
how trolls operate, being manufactured trolls to make straw-man
about what otherwise, presented correctly, would be anti-theses.
I.e., knowledge is added to existence knowledge by something
like a Hegelian dialectic, thesis, anti-thesis, syn-thesis.
Then when two theses, like "continuous space-time manifold
and grainy particle model, GR and QM", come together, then
it also usually involves apologia, "here's what we might've
been thinking", when the greater gestalt arrives at why they're
true together, when before they were false apart.
If that's a sort of straw-man, "troll with a kernel of decency",
I suppose there's the other kind, knocks you down then says
"brush your teeth, ...", as if in your interest.
Here it's "floss the teeth, and stay away from processed foods
and sugary drank". You can take it or leave it, and don't need
some straw-man troll to tell you it is or isn't so, and don't
need some straw-man troll to tell you it is or isn't so.