Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal
De : bts.orange (at) *nospam* licorne-bleue.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 21. Apr 2024, 22:42:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <fS24_TH9LGawrHyPSfEniV8t5Dc@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 21/04/2024 à 23:19, Python a écrit :
We may not have the same space-time path, and have the same proper time, the same path, and the same improper time (for other observers).
 To have the same improper time is meaningless because in a given
frame of reference there is a single time elapsed between any
two events. And there are only two events : travelers' depart
and travelers' meeting again.
 Moreover to have the same path (in the spatial sense) is a
property that is only true in a single frame of reference.
 It makes no sense (outside of a trivial one in Galilean Relativity)
to claim that a condition depending on a given chosen frame could
imply a property (equality of proper times) that does not depend
on that.
 
Note that "space-time path", I don't understand the geometric concept very well.
 It's not a big deal! It is the set of events "traveler is at this
position at that time".
 
[snip babbling]
 Your claim is directly violating the principle of Relativity. End of
Story.
Having the same improper time is on the contrary an important relativistic concept, as important as having the same proper time.
For example, in the example of the two travelers from Tau Ceti, Stella and Bella, one in Galilean mode (Vo=0.929c), the other in accelerated mode (a=1.052ly/y²), we notice that the The observer Terrence (terrestrial) will give them the same improper time. That is 12,915 years.
This means that they leave together, make the same journey, and arrive together, although the journey was never joint at any point of the journey.
This is a point that all physicists in the world accept (I hope).
It is on Bella's notion of proper time that we no longer agree because the way physicists go about it in accelerated frames of reference does not seem entirely correct or logical to me.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Apr 24 * [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal36Richard Hachel
13 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal6Python
13 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Python
13 Apr 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Python
14 Apr 24 i    `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
13 Apr 24 +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Osman Agelakos
13 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5gharnagel
13 Apr 24 i+* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 ii`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2gharnagel
14 Apr 24 ii `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Cherles Hoffmann
14 Apr 24 i`- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Leolin Vilinbahov
20 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal23Tom Roberts
20 Apr 24  +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal9Python
21 Apr 24  i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal8Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5Python
21 Apr 24  i i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Python
22 Apr 24  i i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Richard Hachel
22 Apr 24  i i   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
21 Apr 24  i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Python
21 Apr 24  i  `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Richard Hachel
20 Apr 24  +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Maciej Wozniak
20 Apr 24  +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1German Dorotea
21 Apr 24  +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Athel Cornish-Bowden
21 Apr 24  i `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Zhunda Mochalov
21 Apr 24  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal8Ross Finlayson
21 Apr 24   +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal6Python
21 Apr 24   i+- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Kory Kato
21 Apr 24   i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24   i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Python
21 Apr 24   i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24   i   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
21 Apr 24   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Tai Loong

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal