Sujet : Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem
De : volney (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Volney)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 02. Jun 2024, 17:46:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3i7m0$3e028$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/2/2024 11:02 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>
We cannot subtract one deformation from another deformation in such a simplistic way, and it is a serious relativistic mistake to do
so.
>
The mistake is one who has three Nobel prizes in basket weaving
purports
to know relativity.
Watches necessarily have anisochrony, but you don't understand this term.
Because you made it up, it's not a part of English or physics.
You are confusing it with dyschronotropia.
Another made up word with no known meaning.
It is obvious that two watches placed in the same frame of reference have the same chronotropy.
They have the same chronotropy.
And yet another made up word.
Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem
Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem
