Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Le 10/08/2024 à 18:26, Richard Hachel a écrit :Most of Nostradamus's "predictions" are so vague and unclesr that you can interpret them any way you like. However, there is one that stands out:Le 10/08/2024 à 18:14, Python a écrit :[for non French-speaking readers: M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand isLe 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit :Ah, te voilà, toi?On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claimsW dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from hisAt first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while forOnly such an idiot believe these nonsensical
the PTB to come around. But it didn't happen until experimental
evidence prevailed.
ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of
the idiot was not even consistent.
outrageous fantasies :-))
to be true.
IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound
"arguments".
Je te croyais disparu sous la claque que tu t'es prise, et qui portait sur Nostradamus.
Je t'ai demandé d'expliquer le quatrain (ce que j'ai fait, et qui n'a rien à voir avec tes conneries de Louis XIV) et de me montrer si, avec tes immenses talents d'historiens ou de critique, tu pouvais me prouver que cela avait été écris avant 1660.
Magnes toi un peu les couilles, au lieu de faire le con sur usenet.
babbling some unclear claims about Nostradamus' "predictions" here]
I don't give a sh*t on this new stupid hobby of yours. I would,--
anyway, be concerned if I lived in Saint-Izan-de-Soudiac and a
local country Doctor was fond of this kind of demented nonsense.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.