Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 25. Sep 2024, 17:39:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <1UJOcSAxNDEKT6JSvPp3cCEB39g@jntp>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 25/09/2024 à 13:46, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Den 25.09.2024 00:25, skrev rhertz:
 The most evident proof about that relativity is a PSEUDOSCIENCE is the
infamous "twin paradox", which occupied time and words of (otherwise)
bright minds exposed to relativism since 1910.
 
This is not a pseudo-science, it is an absolutely correct science.
It is simply extremely poorly explained by relativistic physicists and mathematicians, who do not understand anything about it at all and only pose equations that are half true and half false.
To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax) is true.
D'=D.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) is false. The contraction of distances is totally inappropriate.
They think (and I never understood how they can make such a mistake as the bad contraction of distances observed by a neutral observer of Stella's frame of reference, that is to say at an equal distance from the elements of the entire inertial universe of Terrence) that it is equal to D'=D.sqrt(1-v²/c²) .
This is not the contraction observed by Stella, and the 12 ly do not transform into 7.2 ly FOR HER.
We must use the equation D'=D.sqrt(1-v²/c²)/(1+cosµ.v/c)
We then see that if µ is different from 0 the result is mind-blowing.
However, Stella does not move transversely (or rather the earth transversely in relation to her), but longitudinally.
We have cosµ=1 on the way out and cosµ=-1 on the way back.
If we forget this simple and logical geometry, everything enters into mathematical horror, and no one understands anything anymore.
It even becomes impossible to explain how Stella can see the earth moving away at 0.4444c on the way out, then come back to it at 4c on the way back, in a journey that will last twice 9 years of her own time.
This is not a pseudo-science, it is an absolutely correct science.
It is simply extremely poorly explained by relativistic physicists and mathematicians, who do not understand anything about it at all and only pose equations that are half true and half false.
 All sprinkled with an immense sense of arrogance.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Sep 24 * Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!30rhertz
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!22Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!19rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!16rhertz
25 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!15rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii i i `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iii i i  `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct 24 iii i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Maciej Wozniak
26 Sep 24 iii `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7Paul.B.Andersen
26 Sep 24 iii  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii   `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5Paul.B.Andersen
27 Sep 24 iii    `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii     `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
28 Sep 24 iii      `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
29 Sep 24 iii       `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 i+- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24 i`- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
26 Sep 24 +- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1bertietaylor
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6J. J. Lodder
1 Oct 24  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5rhertz
1 Oct 24   +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3Paul.B.Andersen
1 Oct 24   i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24   i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
5 Oct 24   `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1J. J. Lodder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal