Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1

On 6/3/2025 10:29 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/3/2025 8:57 PM, dbush wrote:

On 6/3/2025 5:14 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/3/2025 3:48 PM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:47:23 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/3/2025 3:28 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.jun.2025 om 17:52 schreef olcott:

>

DDD correctly emulated by HHH diverges from DDD correctly emulated by
HHH1 as soon as HHH begins emulating itself emulating DDD, marked
below.
*HHH1 never emulates itself emulating DDD*

>

*This is the beginning of the divergence of the behavior*
*of DDD emulated by HHH versus DDD emulated by HHH1*

>

Misleading words when you change the meaning of diverging.
Mike showed the traces side by side. Even after many requests, you
still cannot show the first instruction that is interpreted differently
by HHH and HHH1. The only difference is that HHH gives up the
simulation too early.

>
As soon as HHH begins emulating itself and HHH1 NEVER begins emulating
itself THIS IS THE DIVERGENCE.

Yes, that is exactly the point where HHH aborts.

>
Both the divergence and the abort are shown below.
>
_DDD()
[00002183] 55             push ebp
[00002184] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002186] 6883210000     push 00002183 ; push DDD
[0000218b] e833f4ffff     call 000015c3 ; call HHH
[00002190] 83c404         add esp,+04
[00002193] 5d             pop ebp
[00002194] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002194]
>
_main()
[000021a3] 55             push ebp
[000021a4] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[000021a6] 6883210000     push 00002183 ; push DDD
[000021ab] e843f3ffff     call 000014f3 ; call HHH1
[000021b0] 83c404         add esp,+04
[000021b3] 33c0           xor eax,eax
[000021b5] 5d             pop ebp
[000021b6] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0020) [000021b6]
>
  machine   stack     stack     machine    assembly
  address   address   data      code       language
  ========  ========  ========  ========== =============
[000021a3][0010382d][00000000] 55         push ebp      ; main()
[000021a4][0010382d][00000000] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; main()
[000021a6][00103829][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
[000021ab][00103825][000021b0] e843f3ffff call 000014f3 ; call HHH1
New slave_stack at:1038d1
>
Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation   Execution Trace Stored at:1138d9
[00002183][001138c9][001138cd] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of HHH1
[00002184][001138c9][001138cd] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of HHH1
[00002186][001138c5][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
[0000218b][001138c1][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
New slave_stack at:14e2f9
>
Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation   Execution Trace Stored at:15e301
[00002183][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of HHH[0]
[00002184][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of HHH[0]
[00002186][0015e2ed][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
[0000218b][0015e2e9][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
New slave_stack at:198d21
>
THIS IS WHERE THE DIVERGENCE OF DDD EMULATED BY HHH
AND DDD EMULATED BY HHH1 BEGINS

>
So how exactly do HHH and HHH1 emulate the first instruction of HHH differently?
>

 The question is incorrect.
HHH emulates DDD two times and HHH1 emulates DDD one time
the whole second time is the divergence.

There is no divergence if the instructions are emulated exactly the same in both cases.  What happened before either emulation started is irrelevant.
The only way for the emulations to diverge is if there is a particular instruction such that X happens if HHH emulates it and Y happens if HHH1 emulates it.  Again, what happened before either emulation started is irrelevant.
So I'll ask one more time:  how exactly do HHH and HHH1 emulate the first instruction of HHH, or *any* instruction that is part of the emulation of DDD, differently?
Failure to provide the above explanation in your next reply or within
one hour of your next post in this newsgroup will be taken as your
official on-the-record admission that the emulations of DDD performed
by HHH and HHH1 do *not* diverge but are in fact the same up to the
point that HHH aborts.

 

Failure to provide the above explanation in your next reply or within one hour of your next post in this newsgroup will be taken as your official on-the-record admission that the emulations of DDD performed by HHH and HHH1 do *not* diverge but are in fact the same up to the point that HHH aborts.
>
>

>
*The above call causes HHH to emulate itself emulating DDD*
*HHH1 never emulates itself at all*
>
[00002183][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of HHH[1]
[00002184][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of HHH[1]
[00002186][001a8d15][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
[0000218b][001a8d11][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped
>
[00002190][001138c9][001138cd] 83c404     add esp,+04 ; DDD of HHH1
[00002193][001138cd][000015a8] 5d         pop ebp     ; DDD of HHH1
[00002194][001138d1][0003a980] c3         ret         ; DDD of HHH1
[000021b0][0010382d][00000000] 83c404     add esp,+04 ; main()
[000021b3][0010382d][00000000] 33c0       xor eax,eax ; main()
[000021b5][00103831][00000018] 5d         pop ebp     ; main()
[000021b6][00103835][00000000] c3         ret         ; main()
Number of Instructions Executed(352831) == 5266 Pages
>
>
>
>
>

>