Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ca philosophy 
Sujet : Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.
De : dnomhcir (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Richmond)
Groupes : comp.ai.philosophy
Date : 21. Apr 2025, 18:26:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Frantic
Message-ID : <86v7qx77eq.fsf@example.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Doc O'Leary ,   <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> writes:

For your reference, records indicate that
Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>
If ChatGPT didn't flatly deny that it is conscious, I think I would
assume it is conscious, as it is more convincing than some human beings
who don't seem to even know what consciousness means.
>
That says more about you than it does about LLMs or the people you know. 
It’s also nothing new:
>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect>

ChatGPT-4o is nothing like Eliza, so you can't draw conclusions from one
to the other.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Apr16:50 * A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.7Richmond
21 Apr17:40 `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.6Doc O'Leary ,
21 Apr18:26  `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.5Richmond
23 Apr17:43   `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.4Doc O'Leary ,
23 Apr18:22    `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.3Richmond
25 Apr19:00     `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.2Doc O'Leary ,
25 Apr21:01      `- Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.1Richmond

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal