Sujet : Re: Hypothetical possibilities
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory comp.ai.philosophyDate : 20. Jul 2024, 20:09:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/20/2024 2:00 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 20.jul.2024 om 17:28 schreef olcott:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
}
>
int main()
{
DDD();
}
>
(a) Termination Analyzers / Partial Halt Deciders must halt
this is a design requirement.
>
(b) Every simulating termination analyzer HHH either
aborts the simulation of its input or not.
>
(c) Within the hypothetical case where HHH does not abort
the simulation of its input {HHH, emulated DDD and executed DDD}
never stop running.
>
This violates the design requirement of (a) therefore HHH must
abort the simulation of its input.
And when it aborts, the simulation is incorrect. When HHH aborts and halts, it is not needed to abort its simulation, because it will halt of its own.
So you are trying to get away with saying that no HHH
ever needs to abort the simulation of its input and HHH
will stop running?
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer