Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ca philosophy 
Sujet : Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic comp.ai.philosophy
Date : 07. Dec 2024, 19:44:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj252d$38tkl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/7/2024 12:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 12/7/24 10:43 AM, olcott wrote:
On 12/7/2024 6:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 12/7/24 6:32 AM, olcott wrote:
On 12/6/2024 9:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/6/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 12/6/24 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:
On 12/5/2024 11:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 05.12.2024 um 05:20 schrieb olcott:
There is an 80% chance that I will be alive in one month.
There may be an extended pause in my comments.
I will try to bring a computer to the out of town hospital.
>
Maybe you'll solve your halting problem issues before you die.
>
>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
>
int DD()
{
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    if (Halt_Status)
      HERE: goto HERE;
    return Halt_Status;
}
>
int main()
{
    HHH(DD);
}
>
>
I am sure that DD correctly emulated by HHH according to
the semantics of the C programming language cannot possibly
reach its own return instruction final halt state.
>
How does HHH correctly emulated DD, if it isn't give tne code for the
HHH that DD calls?
>
>
As I have told you many dozens of times HHH and DD share
the same global memory space within memory version of the
Halt7.obj file.
>
>
And thus you admit that your HHH isn’t the required “pure function” as its
result is dependent on that contents of that global memory, and not just
its input, as required by the definition of a global function,
>
>
First we have to acknowledge that pure function or not HHH does something unprecedented in the history of the halting problem:
HHH does correctly reject its input as non-halting.
>
No, it doesn't do anything "unprecedented".
>
>
Changing the subject to a different criteria
IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
>
 Right, which is what *YOU* have done. As your subject says, you are talking about the *HALTING PROPBLEM* which has a defined criteeria
 
When I say the the work that I accomplished ON MY CRITERIA
has never been done before IT IS WOEFULLY DISHONEST to
rebut this by changing the subject to some other criteria.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Nov 24 * HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar45olcott
17 Nov 24 +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar9Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar8olcott
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar7Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar6olcott
18 Nov 24 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar5Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar4olcott
18 Nov 24 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
18 Nov 24 i       `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar23Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar22olcott
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar21Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar20olcott
18 Nov 24 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar19Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar18olcott
18 Nov 24 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar17Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar16olcott
18 Nov 24 i       +- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar14Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar13olcott
18 Nov 24 i         `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar12Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i          `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar11olcott
18 Nov 24 i           `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar10Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i            `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar9olcott
18 Nov 24 i             +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
19 Nov 24 i             i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
19 Nov 24 i             i `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
19 Nov 24 i             `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar5joes
19 Nov 24 i              `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar4olcott
20 Nov 24 i               `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
20 Nov 24 i                `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
20 Nov 24 i                 `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)12olcott
7 Dec 24  `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)11Richard Damon
7 Dec 24   `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)10olcott
7 Dec 24    `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)9Richard Damon
7 Dec 24     `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)8olcott
7 Dec 24      +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
7 Dec 24      i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
7 Dec 24      i `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
8 Dec 24      `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)4olcott
8 Dec 24       +- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
8 Dec 24       `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
8 Dec 24        `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal