Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c editors 
Sujet : Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale)
De : kalevi (at) *nospam* kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.misc
Date : 20. Aug 2024, 21:56:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va2vt0$3h3gj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.10.3-200.fc40.x86_64 (x86_64))
In comp.unix.programmer David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
No, you do not need your particular favourite out of the thousand and
one Linux programming books in order to program for Linux.  You do not
need /any/ book in order to write useful and successful code for Linux.
Of course you need /some/ reference - and in the days before the
internet was so easily available and so full of information, I went
through a lot of programming books.  Some were good, some less so, and
some have become famous.  But none of them were /necessary/ in any way.

Well, I am a quite bad programmer but I am interested enough in the
Linux/UNIX workings so that reading the newest APUE and The Linux
Programming Interface did not feel painful or unnecessary at all. On
the contrary, it was a great pleasure to examine what kind of
programming facilities my favourite OS offers.

Having these two books, or just one of them, is a great way to educate
oneself about Linux/UNIX. I see that The Linux Programming Interface
is available online as a free PDF, but I am not sure whether it is
a pirated version.

There is no better way to learn Linux/UNIX workings than these two
books. Period.

br,
KK

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jun 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal