Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theory
Suivi-à : comp.theory
Date : 06. May 2025, 09:17:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vvcgja$1voc$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/5/2025 10:31 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/5/2025 6:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/4/25 10:23 PM, olcott wrote:
When we define formal systems as a finite list of basic facts and
allow semantic logical entailment as the only rule of inference we
have systems that can express any truth that can be expressed in
language.

Including the existence of undecidable statements.  That is a truth in
_any_ logical system bar the simplest or inconsistent ones.

Also with such systems Undecidability is impossible. The only
incompleteness are things that are unknown or unknowable.

Can such a system include the mathematics of the natural numbers?

If so, your claim is false, as that is enough to create that
undeciability.

It seems to me that the inferences steps that could
otherwise create undecidability cannot exist in the
system that I propose.

The mathematics of natural numbers (as I have already explained)
begins with basic facts about natural numbers and only applies
truth preserving operations to these basic facts.

When we begin with truth and only apply truth preserving
operations then WE NECESSARILY MUST END UP WITH TRUTH.

You will necessarily end up with only a subset of truth, no matter how
shouty you are in writing it.  You'll also end up with undecidability, no
matter how hard you try to pretend it isn't there.

When we ALWAYS end up with TRUTH then we NEVER end up with UNDECIDABILITY.

Shut your eyes, and you won't see it.

Its not that hard, iff you pay enough attention.

It's too hard for you.  As I've already suggested in another post, you'd
do better to show some respect to those who understand the matters you're
dabbling in.  Accept that your level of understanding is not particularly
high, and _learn_ from these other people.

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 May 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal