Sujet : Re: LOOP
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 28. Jun 2025, 13:41:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <1be678489d752a940e171d426000dc17ed1ac471@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
FOR/NEXT DO/LOOP wars have raged ever since Moore introduced the former.
Here's a [cold] blast from the past...
Minutes of the FIGGY BAR RT Conference.
Date: 11/16/89 Time: 22:36EST
<[Wil] W.BADEN1> DO/LOOP will never be as efficient as FOR/NEXT.
<[Wil] W.BADEN1> FOR/NEXT will never be as effective as DO/LOOP.
Date: 06/28/90 Time: 22:32EDT
<[Wil] W.BADEN1> Chuck walked out of ANSI becuz it wudn't make
FOR...NEXT required.
<[Wil] W.BADEN1> That was 1988. And the operative word is "required."