Sujet : Re: docker, what could be the advantage?
De : zbigniew2011 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (LIT)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 20. Jun 2025, 14:09:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <3b926bd8baed1eddde7f2cd0feecf0a2@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
I realised that you run one of my programs, fetched from
>
https://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/figforth.html
>
You post to the world and you expect every Chinese to
understand what you are talking about?
No, I post to the thread and I expect its creator _maybe_
will understand that. But maybe not, from what I see.
It is better that you provide context, and also sign your
messages, if need be with a pseudonum.
Do you really believe, that if someone in the
Internet uses the name 'John Doe' - or, say,
'Paul Johnson' - then really his name is John Doe
(or Paul Johnson)? Because it looks more 'human-like'?
I never make any assumptions like that.
Maybe it does require some special configuration, anything?
How would you expect a 32 bit Forth to work under MSDOS?
Of course it needs a special configuration.
This is explained in README.TXT. How could you have guessed?
Well in README.TXT there is just 'pointer'
to quite basic config.sys recommended, like this:
device=himem.sys
DOS=HIGH
Of course my config-s use that all the time
(among other settings). Do you mean some other
settings may interfere? The abobe seems not
to be enough - that's why I posted my question.
Anyway I tried it again using such spartan
config.sys - and with no autoexec.bat at all
- and it's still not going to work.
DOS 6.22, 386SX 25 Mhz
--