Re: Stack vs stackless operation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Stack vs stackless operation
De : zbigniew2011 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (LIT)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 02. Mar 2025, 11:35:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <3f2854c0754ff10d1c7f9dcaf54b845f@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Oh, so it's simpler way than anyone could guess:
"just use different term, avoid the word 'variable' ".
Done. :)
>
Oh dear, I hope you don't have a formal education in CS. If so, I'd ask
for my money back. You know - it's not a different term - it's a
different concept, with quite different characteristics.
>
„In computer science, array is a data type that represents
a collection of elements (values or variables), each
selected by one or more indices”
>
Now feel free to go and ask for your money back.
>
Interesting.. In your class they taught computer science by Wikipedia?
Didn't they have money for real books? Must have been a real poor city
college..
>
At least in that college they didn't taught that
„Forth uses FIFO stack” -- as they taught you in
your really rich city college. :]
>
I don't think I ever did that in any publication, but even if I did -
people get confused when calling bit 0 "bit 1" because it represents
"1". They get confused choosing the wrong side when they talk about "big
endian". They get confused when classifying the 8088. They go left when
their instructor calls "right".
>
It's like a spelling error. Only petty people try to use that as a
counter argument. It's a different kind of error compared to proposing
"stackless operations" on a stack based language. It's like asking why a
Ferrari can't pour a concrete floor.
No, it WASN'T "spelling error"; you stated that out loud
in your "educational" YT-clip. You forgot? Or you're trying
very hard to forget? No, it wasn't just replacing L by F, you
stated that word-by-word: "Forth uses FIFO stack — first in,
first out".
I'm going to remind you:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/EWLqO2b26nM/m/B7gnoD7dAgAJ
"> > It's here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpw__rmBisU
01:45 -- but you know: Forth's stack works on the rule „last in — first
out”, not „first in, first out”. Or am I wrong?
No, you're not. I pulled it and I'm uploading an updated version.
Hans Bezemer"
And you try to present yourself as an authority after something
like that?

Anything wrong with the quoted definition?
>
Yes. You couldn't produce one. You had to look it up. Something as basic
a concept as "array".
Mr. FIFO, don't you be ridiculous again... :]
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * Stack vs stackless operation72LIT
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4minforth
24 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
24 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2minforth
24 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation14Anton Ertl
24 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation13LIT
25 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation12Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation11LIT
25 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9LIT
25 Feb 25 i     +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5minforth
25 Feb 25 i     i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4LIT
25 Feb 25 i     i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3minforth
25 Feb 25 i     i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i     i   `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Gerry Jackson
25 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i      `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i       `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9dxf
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6dxf
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
26 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4dxf
26 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
26 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2minforth
26 Feb 25 i i    `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
25 Feb 25 i `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Hans Bezemer
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i`- do...loop (was: Stack vs stackless operation)1Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10LIT
26 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9Hans Bezemer
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Hans Bezemer
26 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6LIT
27 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
27 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4LIT
2 Mar 25 i      `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
5 Mar 25 i       `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Hans Bezemer
6 Mar 25 i        `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
25 Feb 25 `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation32LIT
25 Feb 25  +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25  i+- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
26 Feb 25  i +- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6John Ames
26 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
27 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4dxf
27 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
27 Feb 25  i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Hans Bezemer
27 Feb 25  i      `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Waldek Hebisch
26 Feb 25  i`- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation19mhx
26 Feb 25   +- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1minforth
26 Feb 25   +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation16Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25   i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation15Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25   i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Paul Rubin
26 Feb 25   i i+- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1minforth
27 Feb 25   i i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5Anton Ertl
27 Feb 25   i i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Paul Rubin
27 Feb 25   i i i`- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
27 Feb 25   i i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Gerry Jackson
27 Feb 25   i i  `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
28 Feb 25   i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Anton Ertl
28 Feb 25   i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6Paul Rubin
1 Mar 25   i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i    +- Stack caching (: Stack vs stackless operation)1Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i      `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1mhx
27 Feb 25   `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1mhx

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal