Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
De : mhx (at) *nospam* iae.nl (mhx)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 08:06:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <4e7f4e42b851ec0d57352d552ad48929@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Krishna Myneni wrote:

If the community has no issue with retaining 0 SET-ORDER then the
standard's wording should be revised to say that the minimum search
order is the empty search order, i.e. zero wordlists.
IMHO, the committee should refrain from adding restrictions
that only serve to make systems 'not standard' because of non-issues.
-marcel

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 * 0 SET-ORDER why?64Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24 +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3minforth
26 Jun 24 i+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1albert
26 Jun 24 i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24 `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?60Anton Ertl
26 Jun 24  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?26dxf
26 Jun 24  i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?25Ruvim
27 Jun 24  i +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?9dxf
27 Jun 24  i i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24  i ii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
28 Jun 24  i i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?6Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i i +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4dxf
28 Jun 24  i i i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i i i `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2dxf
1 Jul 24  i i i  `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
29 Jun 24  i i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
27 Jun 24  i `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?15Gerry Jackson
27 Jun 24  i  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
27 Jun 24  i  i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1minforth
27 Jun 24  i  +- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
27 Jun 24  i  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?7Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24  i  i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24  i  ii+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24  i  iii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24  i  ii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
29 Jun 24  i  i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24  i  i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1albert
28 Jun 24  i  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i   +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
28 Jun 24  i   i`- Recognizer protocol (was: 0 SET-ORDER why?)1Ruvim
4 Jul 24  i   `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Gerry Jackson
26 Jun 24  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3albert
26 Jun 24  i+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1minforth
26 Jun 24  i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?30Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24   `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?29Anton Ertl
28 Jun 24    +- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Hans Bezemer
29 Jun 24    `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?27Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24     `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?26dxf
30 Jun 24      `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?25Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24       `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?24Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24        `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?23minforth
30 Jun 24         `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?22Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24          `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?21minforth
1 Jul 24           `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?20Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24            +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2mhx
1 Jul 24            i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24            `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?17Ruvim
1 Jul 24             +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?12Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24             i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?6dxf
2 Jul 24             ii+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
3 Jul 24             ii`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Krishna Myneni
3 Jul 24             ii `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3dxf
3 Jul 24             ii  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
3 Jul 24             ii   `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
1 Jul 24             i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3albert
2 Jul 24             ii`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2sjack
2 Jul 24             ii `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
2 Jul 24             i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Ruvim
3 Jul 24             i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
21 Sep 24             `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24              `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3Ruvim
22 Sep 24               `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24                `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Ruvim

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal