Sujet : Re: Overflow Test for M*/
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 13. Jul 2024, 03:03:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <6691e08a$1@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 13/07/2024 5:29 am, minforth wrote:
Why n2 has to be positive is beyond me anyhow.
The TC offered an explanation for that one:
A.8.6.1.1820 M*/
[...] Note that some systems allow signed divisors. This can cost a lot in performance
on some CPUs. The requirement for a positive divisor has not proven to be a problem.
How many applications have you written requiring a negative divisor?
Re: Overflow Test for M*/
Re: Overflow Test for M*/