Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 14. Apr 2025, 04:31:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8674e9ca6eb84435c75244af2384902093399310@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14/04/2025 7:00 am, mhx wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:24:03 +0000, Hans Bezemer wrote:
 
On 13-04-2025 04:50, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
mhx <mhx@iae.nl> wrote:
So 1.00 means a precision required is 5 micron.
>
Where are the microns coming from?
>
What Albert wrote implies that precision is 0.005 (half of 0.01).
But (what he did not wrote) default unit for mechanical work is
milimeter.  0.005 of milimeter is 5 micron.
>
>
Agreed, the terms mu and micron are still quite popular among boomers,
but haven't actually been part of the SI since 1967. It's micrometre,
folks. Glow up!
 
Irrelevant. Albert pointed out that the number "1.00" means nothing
without a context that allows to decide how the number should be
printed or evaluated.
...

But we do know something about it in the context of computer math.
For ex. "1.00" when presented to a computer will be extended to the
intrinsic precision of the computer's floats and be used thereafter
at that precision.  Similarly when it comes to output an fp number
to an external device it will be at the intrinsic precision unless
reduced by the operator.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Mar 25 * "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"200Alexis
27 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5Martin Nicholas
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"4Alexis
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3Martin Nicholas
30 Mar 25 i  +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Alexis
30 Mar 25 i  `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Bernd Linsel
28 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"7anthk
29 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"6mhx
29 Mar 25 i +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
30 Mar 25 i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3anthk
5 Apr 25 i i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1anthk
6 Apr 25 i i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1sjack
31 Mar 25 i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1John Ames
30 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"88sjack
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"87dxf
29 Apr 25 i `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth86Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth82dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i+* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth79Hans Bezemer
1 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth78dxf
1 May 25 i  ii +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3John Doe
1 May 25 i  ii i+- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Stephen Pelc
1 May 25 i  ii i`- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Anton Ertl
1 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth74Hans Bezemer
2 May 25 i  ii  +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth72dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   +* QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)70Anton Ertl
3 May 25 i  ii   i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT67dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT66Anton Ertl
4 May 25 i  ii   ii +* Re: QUIT and ABORT64dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT63Anton Ertl
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT56dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT55Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT50dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT46Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT45dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT44Ruvim
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     +* Re: QUIT and ABORT42dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT41Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT40dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT39Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT38dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2albert
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT35Ruvim
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
13 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT33Ruvim
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT32dxf
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT31Ruvim
15 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT30dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i         `* Re: QUIT and ABORT29Ruvim
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i          `* Re: QUIT and ABORT28dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i           `* Re: QUIT and ABORT27Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i            `* Re: QUIT and ABORT26dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i             `* Re: QUIT and ABORT25Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i              `* Re: QUIT and ABORT24dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i               `* Re: QUIT and ABORT23Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                `* Re: QUIT and ABORT22dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2Anton Ertl
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 `* Re: QUIT and ABORT19Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT18dxf
19 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT17Ruvim
20 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT16dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT15Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +* Re: QUIT and ABORT9mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT5Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT4mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Anton Ertl
11 Jun 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2Gerry Jackson
12 Jun 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i  `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT4dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
25 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2dxf
26 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                         `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT5mhx
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i  +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3albert
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2minforth
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i    `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)1albert
5 May 25 i  ii   `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2sjack
1 May 25 i  i `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3albert
30 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i    `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1mhx
4 Apr 25 +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25 `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"98dxf

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal