Sujet : Re: May the numbers speak - supplement
De : no.email (at) *nospam* nospam.invalid (Paul Rubin)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 13. Jun 2025, 18:47:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <877c1f355f.fsf@nightsong.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
mhx@iae.nl (mhx) writes:
HMS is three times faster than dtimescan and timestrscan, while
HMS2 is 3.5 times slower (as expected).
Is HMS the one that I posted, and HMS2 the version that's almost the
same? Why the speed difference: just because of the extra memory
traffic of leaving extra things on the stack?
May the numbers speak
Re: May the numbers speak - supplement