Sujet : Re: "Back & Forth" - Local variables
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 14. Mar 2025, 03:29:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <926bcdb22f5b30036f236dc5351dcb1b124a3f6e@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14/03/2025 1:35 am, sjack wrote:
dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
Code equivalence is nothing new. It's for sake of clarity that Fig-forth
defined both I and R@ despite them sharing the same code. Forth-83 made
>
To be a little more correct FigForth v1.0 did indeed define
I and R (not R@) to share same code. My FigForth still does.
I believe R@ comes from one of the standards,e.g. Forth-83
AFAIK there was no R or R@ prior to FigForth. MicroForth, Kitt Peat Forth,
'Starting Forth' simply used I for that. It's unclear how FigForth came to
have R or Forth-79 came to have R@ .