Sujet : Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
De : minforth (at) *nospam* gmx.net (minforth)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 30. Jun 2024, 18:38:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <bf66af7e3abb6d49d1e6ff2935802477@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
FORTH-WORDLIST 1 SET-ORDER should bring you "back to life".
IOW the question is whether FORTH-WORDLIST and SET-ORDER
should be findable even when the search-order is empty.
Probably classified as "implementation-defined option".