Re: Overflow Test for M*/

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Overflow Test for M*/
De : minforth (at) *nospam* gmx.net (minforth)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 13. Jul 2024, 09:15:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <d8dab871e00b7eebef0493ba02709d8d@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 2:03:54 +0000, dxf wrote:
How many applications have you written requiring a negative divisor?
What a silly question.
Even in simple Newtonian physics it is not always possible to define
a reference system that avoids negative values. Let alone in
electrical networks.
The "explanation" that +n2 is there to compensate for the performance
loss of some (old?) CPUs sounds strange in a standard document.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jul 24 * Re: Overflow Test for M*/8minforth
13 Jul 24 `* Re: Overflow Test for M*/7dxf
13 Jul 24  +* Re: Overflow Test for M*/3mhx
13 Jul 24  i`* Re: Overflow Test for M*/2Krishna Myneni
14 Jul 24  i `- Re: Overflow Test for M*/1dxf
13 Jul 24  `* Re: Overflow Test for M*/3minforth
13 Jul 24   +- Re: Overflow Test for M*/1mhx
13 Jul 24   `- Re: Overflow Test for M*/1dxf

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal