Re: VALUE and TO implementation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: VALUE and TO implementation
De : minforth (at) *nospam* gmx.net (minforth)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 03. Aug 2024, 10:55:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <ecc2ee176b98033763c1fb2143cb9935@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
TO is not part of the CORE wordset, and the standard has no
normative parts - only compliance requirements, which do not
include TO. See standard section 5.
So language lawyering seems rather insubstantial here.
Don't nail your own foot to the floor...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jul 24 * Operator overloading?78minforth
25 Jul 24 +- Re: Operator overloading?1dxf
25 Jul 24 +* Re: Operator overloading?18Michael Raitza
25 Jul 24 i`* Re: Operator overloading?17minforth
25 Jul 24 i +* Re: Operator overloading?5mhx
25 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Operator overloading?4minforth
26 Jul 24 i i `* Re: Operator overloading?3minforth
26 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: Operator overloading?2mhx
26 Jul 24 i i   `- Re: Operator overloading?1minforth
25 Jul 24 i `* Re: Operator overloading?11Anton Ertl
25 Jul 24 i  +* Re: Operator overloading?2minforth
30 Jul 24 i  i`- Re: Operator overloading?1Ruvim
27 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Operator overloading?8minforth
27 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Operator overloading?7Anton Ertl
27 Jul 24 i    +* Re: Operator overloading?4minforth
30 Jul 24 i    i+- quotations and closures (was: Operator overloading?)1Ruvim
1 Aug 24 i    i`* Re: Operator overloading?2Anton Ertl
1 Aug 24 i    i `- Re: Operator overloading?1minforth
27 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Operator overloading?2albert
29 Jul 24 i     `- Re: Operator overloading?1minforth
26 Jul 24 +- Re: Operator overloading?1Jan Coombs
30 Jul 24 `* Re: Operator overloading?57Stephen Pelc
30 Jul 24  +* Re: Operator overloading?3minforth
30 Jul 24  i+- Re: Operator overloading?1Stephen Pelc
1 Aug 24  i`- Re: Operator overloading?1Anton Ertl
31 Jul 24  `* Re: Operator overloading?53albert
31 Jul 24   `* Re: Operator overloading?52Gerry Jackson
31 Jul 24    +* Re: Operator overloading?50mhx
31 Jul 24    i+* Re: Operator overloading?3minforth
31 Jul 24    ii`* Re: Operator overloading?2mhx
31 Jul 24    ii `- Re: Operator overloading?1mhx
31 Jul 24    i+* VALUE and TO implementation (was: Operator overloading?)45Ruvim
31 Jul 24    ii+* Re: VALUE and TO implementation (was: Operator overloading?)41Anton Ertl
1 Aug 24    iii`* Re: VALUE and TO implementation40Ruvim
1 Aug 24    iii `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation39Anton Ertl
2 Aug 24    iii  `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation38Ruvim
3 Aug 24    iii   +* Re: VALUE and TO implementation35minforth
3 Aug 24    iii   i+* Re: VALUE and TO implementation33Ruvim
3 Aug 24    iii   ii`* Re: VALUE and TO implementation32minforth
4 Aug 24    iii   ii `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation31Ruvim
4 Aug 24    iii   ii  `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation30mhx
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   +* Re: VALUE and TO implementation4Paul Rubin
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   i+* Re: VALUE and TO implementation2mhx
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   ii`- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Ruvim
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   i`- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Ruvim
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   +- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Anton Ertl
4 Aug 24    iii   ii   +* Alternative for long parsing words (was: VALUE and TO implementation)9Ruvim
5 Aug 24    iii   ii   i`* Re: Alternative for long parsing words (was: VALUE and TO implementation)8albert
5 Aug 24    iii   ii   i `* Re: Alternative for long parsing words7Ruvim
5 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  +* Re: Alternative for long parsing words5Anton Ertl
6 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  i+* Re: Alternative for long parsing words2Ruvim
6 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  ii`- Re: Alternative for long parsing words1mhx
6 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  i`* Re: Alternative for long parsing words2Ruvim
9 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  i `- Re: Alternative for long parsing words1Ruvim
6 Aug 24    iii   ii   i  `- Re: Alternative for long parsing words1albert
5 Aug 24    iii   ii   +- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Stephen Pelc
5 Aug 24    iii   ii   `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation14dxf
5 Aug 24    iii   ii    `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation13mhx
5 Aug 24    iii   ii     +* Re: VALUE and TO implementation10dxf
5 Aug 24    iii   ii     i`* Re: VALUE and TO implementation9Ruvim
6 Aug 24    iii   ii     i `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation8dxf
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i  `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation7dxf
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i   +* Re: VALUE and TO implementation3Anton Ertl
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i   i+- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1dxf
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i   i`- Interpretation semantics (was: VALUE and TO implementation)1Ruvim
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i   `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation3albert
7 Aug 24    iii   ii     i    `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation2Paul Rubin
8 Aug 24    iii   ii     i     `- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1albert
5 Aug 24    iii   ii     `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation2Anton Ertl
6 Aug 24    iii   ii      `- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1albert
3 Aug 24    iii   i`- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Anton Ertl
3 Aug 24    iii   `* Re: VALUE and TO implementation2mhx
4 Aug 24    iii    `- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Ruvim
1 Aug 24    ii+* Re: VALUE and TO implementation2minforth
2 Aug 24    iii`- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1albert
1 Aug 24    ii`- Re: VALUE and TO implementation1Ruvim
31 Jul 24    i`- Re: Operator overloading?1Gerry Jackson
31 Jul 24    `- Re: Operator overloading?1Anton Ertl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal