Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth

On 30-04-2025 04:37, dxf wrote:

On 30/04/2025 2:50 am, Hans Bezemer wrote:

...
To force myself to add messages to THROWs (especially in libs with special conditions) I added THROW" - it works like a combination of ABORT" and THROW. You need to specify a THROW code, you need to specify a flag and you need to specify a message.

 What happens in the case of CATCH - what's left on the stack?
 

Surprise, surprise - THROW" calls THROW (actually, it inlines the whole shebang). So - what do you think?
Hans Bezemer