Sujet : Re: Differentiable Forth
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 21. Jul 2024, 09:40:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$51ceed59$51b3b235@daaf33e55fffa313>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <76170601251e921dd20805e084276dab@
www.novabbs.com>,
mhx <
mhx@iae.nl> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 18:12:31 +0000, Paul Rubin wrote:
>
mhx@iae.nl (mhx) writes:
Really? A three-stack Forth with CSP hardware on each GPU core would
be quite a good fit.
>
That's sort of what the GA144 is...
>
The transputers were a better fit. I predict there time will come.
S/there/their/
At that time I posed:
" it make no sense to operate cpu's in parallel, unless the CPU's are
as powerful as they can get."
Smoke that GA144 fan's.
The arrival of the a 64 bit T80000 with Ghz clock speeds, 8 1 Ghz links,
is long overdue. With AI assistance the Chinese will be able to pull
it off within a short time.
I plan to open a mirror from my github at gitcode.com .
Time to learn Chinese.
Radar signal processing was a Forte of the transputer at the time.
So support of the military is not out of the question.
>
-marcel
Groetjes Albert
-- Don't praise the day before the evening. One swallow doesn't make spring.You must not say "hey" before you have crossed the bridge. Don't sell thehide of the bear until you shot it. Better one bird in the hand than ten inthe air. First gain is a cat purring. - the Wise from Antrim -