On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a compact code area.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a compact code area.
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 27. Feb 2025, 13:18:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$5ebf0a90$7fda5189@6e06ea9bf1a470ef>
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
I test lina64 on my AMD FX-8370 8 core 4 Ghz.

The genuine Byte benchmark sieve takes 1.5 ms on my unmodified lina.
That is a indirect threaded Forth with no optimisation and all the
machine code scattered throughout the dictionary.

I build a version where there is actually a code segment and all code is
collected there. There was no significant difference in speed.

All the code of the Forth fits comfortable in the L1 cache.
Is this to be expected?
An  L1 cache hit is an L1 cache hit?

Could Intel processors respond more to this distinction?


Groetjes Albert
--
Temu exploits Christians: (Disclaimer, only 10 apostles)
Last Supper Acrylic Suncatcher - 15Cm Round Stained Glass- Style Wall
Art For Home, Office And Garden Decor - Perfect For Windows, Bars,
And Gifts For Friends Family And Colleagues.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Feb 25 * On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a compact code area.3albert
27 Feb 25 `* Re: On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a compact code area.2Anton Ertl
28 Feb 25  `- Re: On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a compact code area.1albert

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal