Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
De : krishna.myneni (at) *nospam* ccreweb.org (Krishna Myneni)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 26. Jun 2024, 11:56:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5gs5j$23lka$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/26/24 02:49, Anton Ertl wrote:
Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> writes:
Why is 0 a valid argument to SET-ORDER (from the optional Search-Order
word set)? It can leave a Forth system in a non-recoverable state.
 So what?  There are lots of ways to put a Forth system in a
non-recoverable state.
...
By design? No.
--
Krishna

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 * 0 SET-ORDER why?64Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24 +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3minforth
26 Jun 24 i+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1albert
26 Jun 24 i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24 `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?60Anton Ertl
26 Jun 24  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?26dxf
26 Jun 24  i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?25Ruvim
27 Jun 24  i +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?9dxf
27 Jun 24  i i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24  i ii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
28 Jun 24  i i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?6Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i i +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4dxf
28 Jun 24  i i i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i i i `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2dxf
1 Jul 24  i i i  `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
29 Jun 24  i i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
27 Jun 24  i `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?15Gerry Jackson
27 Jun 24  i  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
27 Jun 24  i  i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1minforth
27 Jun 24  i  +- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
27 Jun 24  i  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?7Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24  i  i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24  i  ii+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24  i  iii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24  i  ii`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
29 Jun 24  i  i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24  i  i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1albert
28 Jun 24  i  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Ruvim
28 Jun 24  i   +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
28 Jun 24  i   i`- Recognizer protocol (was: 0 SET-ORDER why?)1Ruvim
4 Jul 24  i   `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Gerry Jackson
26 Jun 24  +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3albert
26 Jun 24  i+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1minforth
26 Jun 24  i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?30Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24   `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?29Anton Ertl
28 Jun 24    +- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Hans Bezemer
29 Jun 24    `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?27Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24     `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?26dxf
30 Jun 24      `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?25Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24       `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?24Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24        `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?23minforth
30 Jun 24         `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?22Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24          `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?21minforth
1 Jul 24           `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?20Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24            +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2mhx
1 Jul 24            i`- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24            `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?17Ruvim
1 Jul 24             +* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?12Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24             i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?6dxf
2 Jul 24             ii+- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
3 Jul 24             ii`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Krishna Myneni
3 Jul 24             ii `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3dxf
3 Jul 24             ii  `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2albert
3 Jul 24             ii   `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
1 Jul 24             i+* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3albert
2 Jul 24             ii`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2sjack
2 Jul 24             ii `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1dxf
2 Jul 24             i`* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Ruvim
3 Jul 24             i `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Krishna Myneni
21 Sep 24             `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?4Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24              `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?3Ruvim
22 Sep 24               `* Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?2Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24                `- Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?1Ruvim

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal