Re: Standardization process

On 2024-09-18 14:16, dxf wrote:

On 18/09/2024 5:07 pm, Ruvim wrote:

On 2024-09-18 07:39, dxf wrote:
...
>

Their role on the TC is to ensure
nothing jeopardizes their investment.  It's impossible to have spent
20 years 'standardizing' and have achieved so little.

>
This critics is absolutely fruitless. No one owes you to develop any specifications unless you pay for it. Whether some people have achieved much or little is their own business.

 When the ANS-TC sat, they did consider it their business and priority.

And what?  Anybody can claim that.

They knew the world wasn't going to wait.  Perhaps the situation has
changed and now it's only fans the TC need worry about.

If the attitude is 'take it or leave it',

I think, you missed another option. The attitude is: take it, or make it better, or leave it (and maybe build your own theme park).
I don't see on what basis can someone *demand* something from the TC.

I've made that choice.

It seems, despite your choice, the Forth standardization process that is based on the forth-standard.org platform still bothers your.  Then why don't you want to take part?
--
Ruvim