Re: value-flavoured structures

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: value-flavoured structures
De : ruvim.pinka (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ruvim)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 27. Sep 2024, 20:28:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd710j$mrev$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-09-27 16:46, minforth wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:27:18 +0000, Ruvim wrote:
I said about the source code *around* the usage places.
 I see. Forth has only type-specific - or should one rather
say - stack-specific operators.
 Introduce variant data-types, as some BASIC compilers have,
you really have to invent a new 'Forthish' dialect.
Such dialects, or better said, descendants, already exist.
For example: Factor, StrongForth.

Probably useless for embedded applications.
Agreed.
--
Ruvim

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Aug 24 * Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]142Buzz McCool
30 Aug 24 +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]9minforth
31 Aug 24 i+- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1BuzzMcCool
2 Sep 24 i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]4Buzz McCool
3 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3dxf
3 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2Buzz McCool
3 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1dxf
11 Sep 24 i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2minforth
11 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Hans Bezemer
12 Sep 24 i`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1dxf
31 Aug 24 `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]132dxf
31 Aug 24  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]131BuzzMcCool
6 Sep 24   `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]130Buzz McCool
7 Sep 24    +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]123Hans Bezemer
10 Sep 24    i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]122Paul Rubin
10 Sep 24    i +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1dxf
11 Sep 24    i +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]117dxf
11 Sep 24    i i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]116dxf
12 Sep 24    i i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]115Paul Rubin
12 Sep 24    i i  +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]98dxf
12 Sep 24    i i  i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3minforth
12 Sep 24    i i  ii`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2mhx
12 Sep 24    i i  ii `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1minforth
12 Sep 24    i i  i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]57Anton Ertl
13 Sep 24    i i  ii`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]56dxf
13 Sep 24    i i  ii `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]55minforth
13 Sep 24    i i  ii  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]54dxf
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]10Paul Rubin
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2Jan Coombs
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   ii`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Anton Ertl
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]7dxf
14 Sep 24    i i  ii   i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]6Paul Rubin
14 Sep 24    i i  ii   i  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]5dxf
14 Sep 24    i i  ii   i   `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]4Paul Rubin
15 Sep 24    i i  ii   i    `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3dxf
15 Sep 24    i i  ii   i     `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24    i i  ii   i      `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1dxf
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1albert
13 Sep 24    i i  ii   `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]42Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24    i i  ii    `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]41dxf
14 Sep 24    i i  ii     +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1minforth
14 Sep 24    i i  ii     `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]39Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24    i i  ii      +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1dxf
15 Sep 24    i i  ii      `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]37Stephen Pelc
15 Sep 24    i i  ii       `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]36Anton Ertl
15 Sep 24    i i  ii        +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]9Stephen Pelc
15 Sep 24    i i  ii        i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]7Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]6Stephen Pelc
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1minforth
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]4Anton Ertl
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3mhx
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii   `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2Anton Ertl
17 Sep 24    i i  ii        ii    `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1mhx
16 Sep 24    i i  ii        i`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Anton Ertl
27 Sep 24    i i  ii        `* value-flavoured structures (was: Avoid treating the stack as an array)26Ruvim
27 Sep 24    i i  ii         +* Re: value-flavoured structures15minforth
27 Sep 24    i i  ii         i+- Re: value-flavoured structures1mhx
27 Sep 24    i i  ii         i`* Re: value-flavoured structures13Ruvim
27 Sep 24    i i  ii         i `* Re: value-flavoured structures12minforth
27 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  +* Re: value-flavoured structures8Ruvim
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  i+* Re: value-flavoured structures6Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  ii+* Re: value-flavoured structures2dxf
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  iii`- Re: value-flavoured structures1Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  ii`* Re: value-flavoured structures3albert
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  ii `* Re: value-flavoured structures2Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  ii  `- Re: value-flavoured structures1Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24    i i  ii         i  i`- Re: value-flavoured structures1dxf
3 Oct 24    i i  ii         i  `* Re: value-flavoured structures3Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24    i i  ii         i   `* Re: value-flavoured structures2dxf
4 Oct 24    i i  ii         i    `- Re: value-flavoured structures1albert
3 Oct 24    i i  ii         `* Re: value-flavoured structures (was: Avoid treating the stack as an array)10Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24    i i  ii          `* Re: value-flavoured structures9Ruvim
4 Oct 24    i i  ii           `* Re: value-flavoured structures8Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24    i i  ii            `* Re: value-flavoured structures7Ruvim
4 Oct 24    i i  ii             `* Re: value-flavoured structures6Anton Ertl
5 Oct 24    i i  ii              `* Re: value-flavoured structures5Ruvim
5 Oct 24    i i  ii               `* Re: value-flavoured structures4Anton Ertl
6 Oct 24    i i  ii                +- value-flavoured properties of a word (was: value-flavoured structures)1Ruvim
6 Oct 24    i i  ii                +- value-flavoured approach (was: value-flavoured structures)1Ruvim
6 Oct 24    i i  ii                `- value-flavoured approach in API (was: value-flavoured structures)1Ruvim
14 Sep 24    i i  i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]37Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24    i i  i +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]34Ahmed
14 Sep 24    i i  i i+* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]32Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24    i i  i ii`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]31Ahmed
14 Sep 24    i i  i ii +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Ahmed
14 Sep 24    i i  i ii +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]7Ahmed
14 Sep 24    i i  i ii i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]6mhx
14 Sep 24    i i  i ii i +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]4Ahmed
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii i i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3minforth
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii i i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2Ahmed
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii i i  `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Ahmed
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii i `- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1albert
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]22dxf
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii  +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]16Ahmed
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i`* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]15mhx
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]14ahmed
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]13Ahmed
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i   `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]12mhx
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i    +- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Ahmed
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i    +* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3dxf
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i    i+- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1Ahmed
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i    i`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1mhx
16 Sep 24    i i  i ii  i    `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]7Paul Rubin
15 Sep 24    i i  i ii  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]5Paul Rubin
15 Sep 24    i i  i i`- Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]1albert
15 Sep 24    i i  i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]2dxf
12 Sep 24    i i  `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]16Anton Ertl
11 Sep 24    i `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]3Hans Bezemer
8 Sep 24    `* Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]6Stephen Pelc

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal