Sujet : Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
De : anton (at) *nospam* mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 28. Jun 2024, 16:50:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID : <2024Jun28.175045@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : xrn 10.11
Krishna Myneni <
krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> writes:
On 6/26/24 02:49, Anton Ertl wrote:
Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> writes:
Why is 0 a valid argument to SET-ORDER (from the optional Search-Order
word set)? It can leave a Forth system in a non-recoverable state.
So what? There are lots of ways to put a Forth system in a
non-recoverable state.
...
>
By design? No.
Does it matter?
If the user accidentially puts the Forth system in a non-recoverable
state, there is no difference between "by design" (e.g., 0 SET-ORDER)
and "by doing non-standard things".
If the user intentionally puts the Forth system in a non-recoverable
state (e.g.,
<
https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/gforth/Docs-html/Crash-Course-Tutorial.html>),
it does not matter, either.
- anton
-- M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.htmlcomp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html New standard: https://forth-standard.org/ EuroForth 2024: https://euro.theforth.net
0 SET-ORDER why?
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
