Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?

On 6/30/24 11:10, Krishna Myneni wrote:

On 6/29/24 21:21, dxf wrote:

...

Under what circumstances is 0 SET-ORDER executed inadvertently?
>

 One example: assume you have a value containing the number of wordlists
 0 value Nwid
 and it is not properly set. Then doing,
 wid1 wid2 ... widn Nwid SET-ORDER
 

Beyond any particular case in which 0 SET-ORDER might occur, I am more concerned with the fact that the standard does not guarantee a minimum search order, from which it is useful to recover the search order including it and the Forth word list. At the core, this is really the problem.
--
Krishna