Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?

On 28/06/2024 11:20, Ruvim wrote:

On 2024-06-27 08:14, Gerry Jackson wrote:

On 26/06/2024 14:36, Ruvim wrote:

One possible use case:
>
   : turnkey ( -- ) 0 set-order
     also Target definitions
     also Minimal also
   ;

>
ALSO duplicates the wordlist at the head of the search order. If the search order is empty there is nothing to duplicate. Therefore ALSO applied to an empty search order ought to be an ambiguous condition.

 Agree. This code is formally incorrect.
 An ambiguous condition should be declared for ALSO
when the search order is empty.
 I collect such cases at
<https://github.com/ForthHub/standard-evolution/issues/5>
 Then a proposal should be prepared.

Another ambiguous condition that should be added is the execution of DEFINITIONS when the search order is empty
--
Gerry