Sujet : Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 16. Aug 2024, 05:23:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <66bed441$1@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 15/08/2024 7:04 pm,
albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
In article <66bd607c$1@news.ausics.net>, dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
On 15/08/2024 5:46 am, minforth wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:49:45 +0000, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
Ticking a constant or constant string makes no sense.
>
Try
>
' +INF
>
It takes forever.
>
Some folks think this works :)
>
' God
>
Some Forth try to speed up by predefining constants:
' 0
OK
.S
S[ 4206176 ] OK
SEE 0
0000,0000,0000,0000 CONSTANT 0
What has to do with anything?
It has to do with the assertion ticking constants and strings 'might a good thing'.
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings