Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl forth |
Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> writes:Yes, overriding the system's file search mechanism used by "included" is a very interesting idea!Do you know practical cases of using "include-file" in programs?One way I am thinking about is to implement INCLUDED etc. Systems
deal differently with relative filenames for INCLUDED, with less
differences for OPEN-FILE. So if I want to implement a certain
handling of relative filenames for INCLUDED in order to get rid of
system differences, one way to do it is to do it for OPEN-FILE and
then perform INCLUDE-FILE.
Such a system must probably be multitasking. Otherwise, the Forth system instance that runs "read-file" is a slaver of the corresponding pipe emitter until the pipe is closed (i.e., until the master wants).Using other system-specific means, this word can probably be used toHeinz Schnitter implemented Open Network Forth, a distributed system,
organize inter-process communication: when a file descriptor (e.g. a
pipe) is passed from one process to another and used as the input
source. But why do you need to load Forth code this way?
where the parts communicated by sending Forth source code to each
other. One could implement that by having network connections
(telnet-style or ssh-style) between the parts, and the receiver could
INCLUDE-FILE the file-id that represents his end of the connection.
However, Open Network Forth was written around 1984, long before
INCLUDE-FILE was standardized. Bernd Paysan uses ideas from it in his
work, inclluding sending Forth commands between tasks, but AFAIK does
not use INCLUDE-FILE for that.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.