Re: Standardization process

On 18/09/2024 8:51 pm, Ruvim wrote:

On 2024-09-18 14:16, dxf wrote:

On 18/09/2024 5:07 pm, Ruvim wrote:

On 2024-09-18 07:39, dxf wrote:
...
>

Their role on the TC is to ensure
nothing jeopardizes their investment.  It's impossible to have spent
20 years 'standardizing' and have achieved so little.

>
This critics is absolutely fruitless. No one owes you to develop any specifications unless you pay for it. Whether some people have achieved much or little is their own business.

>
When the ANS-TC sat, they did consider it their business and priority.

 
And what?  Anybody can claim that.

Not many can back it up with a 200+ page technical document.

I've made that choice.

 
It seems, despite your choice, the Forth standardization process that is based on the forth-standard.org platform still bothers your. 

Why do I talk about the Standard?  It's kind of unavoidable in technical
discussions when forthers have been suckled on it.

Then why don't you want to take part?

Perhaps because I've seen your success rate :)