Sujet : Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
De : achowe (at) *nospam* snert.com (Anthony Howe)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 21. Sep 2024, 20:37:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcn79g$1n7h4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-07-01 05:02, Ruvim wrote:
And if the term "minimum search order" is renamed to "small search order" (as an example), will this solve the problem?
Minimum functional search order?
-- Anthony C Howeachowe@snert.com BarricadeMX & Miltershttp://nanozen.snert.com/ http://software.snert.com/