Re: Number parsing with checks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Number parsing with checks
De : stephen (at) *nospam* vfxforth.com (Stephen Pelc)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 14. Oct 2024, 15:21:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vej9d0$17sr7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Usenapp for MacOS
On 12 Oct 2024 at 18:40:07 CEST, "mhx" <mhx> wrote:

My convention has always been that if a word starts with
a '?', it tests and [possibly] aborts. This makes
'-DROP' unnecessary.

The same convention is used by MPE, but I'm sure that there are exceptions
in our code.

Stephen
--
Stephen Pelc, stephen@vfxforth.com
MicroProcessor Engineering, Ltd. - More Real, Less Time
133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England
tel: +44 (0)78 0390 3612,  +34 649 662 974
http://www.mpeforth.com
   MPE website
http://www.vfxforth.com/downloads/VfxCommunity/
   downloads

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Oct 24 * Number parsing with checks17dxf
12 Oct 24 `* Re: Number parsing with checks16Ruvim
12 Oct 24  +* Re: Number parsing with checks4Ruvim
12 Oct 24  i`* Re: Number parsing with checks3mhx
12 Oct 24  i +- Re: Number parsing with checks1Ruvim
14 Oct 24  i `- Re: Number parsing with checks1Stephen Pelc
13 Oct 24  `* Re: Number parsing with checks11dxf
13 Oct 24   `* Re: Number parsing with checks10Ruvim
13 Oct 24    +* Re: Number parsing with checks8dxf
13 Oct 24    i`* Naming conventions (was: Number parsing with checks)7Ruvim
13 Oct 24    i `* Re: Naming conventions6dxf
13 Oct 24    i  +* Re: Naming conventions3Ruvim
13 Oct 24    i  i+- Re: Naming conventions1mhx
14 Oct 24    i  i`- Re: Naming conventions1dxf
14 Oct 24    i  `* Re: Naming conventions2Ruvim
14 Oct 24    i   `- Re: Naming conventions1dxf
14 Oct 24    `- Re: Number parsing with checks1dxf

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal