Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:43:11 +0000, Hans Bezemer wrote:

On 31-01-2025 16:16, ahmed wrote:

I didn't do this comparison for anything but just to test the
possibility to integrate it (use it) in my forth programs which need
speed (fuzzy logic, neural networks).
I'm not arguing anything about forth or 4th, I'm just a user.

>
"But what about the speed of execution?"
Well, you wanted an explanation - and you got one: primitives will
always win from fancy, high level implementations. That's why you have
to test your specific implementation if the documentation isn't clear on
how certain features are implemented.

Thanks, for this explanation.
..

 From a user perspective, the story is very simple - pick the one that
fits you. Who am I to argue with what you need? I don't know you and I
don't know the task you want to fulfill.

That's what I'm doing.

If I have any beef it's why do you need a 50 line (high level) reference
implementation if you can implement the same functionality with one
single cleverly designed line (which is much more Forth like).

Yes, you are right.

And yeah - don't use locals at all. Bad habit. Gee - coming from me,
that's a big surprise.
>
Hans Bezemer

Ahmed
--