Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines
De : melahi_ahmed (at) *nospam* yahoo.fr (ahmed)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 01. Feb 2025, 09:22:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6efc4fec918d6d2bc29250159bafb5de@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 7:26:11 +0000, Anton Ertl wrote:

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
This seems more in the locals spirit:
>
: blend { a x b -- n } 100 b x - b a - */ ;
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
   a x <= x b < AND IF b x a blend EXIT THEN
   b x <= x c < AND IF b x c blend EXIT THEN
   0 ;
>
Forth has a word WITHIN that should come in handy here:
>
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
    x a b within IF b x a blend EXIT THEN
    x b c within IF b x c blend EXIT THEN
    0 ;
Yes, it works fine. Thanks.

Another alternative, assuming a<=b<=c:
>
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
    case
      x a < ?of 0 endof
      x b < ?of b x a blend endof
      x c < ?of b x c blend endof
      0 0
    endcase ;
It also works fine without problems.

>
The disadvantage in the latter case is that the above and below cases
are separate, needing another branch and possibly increasing the
number of mispredictions.  This can be addressed with:
>
[undefined] select [if]
: select ( u1 u2 f -- u )
  if swap then nip ;
[then]
>
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
    x a c within if
      b x  x b < a c select  blend
    else
      0
    then ;
This latter gives wrong results:
-100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0  ok    \ this is true
-50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . -4900  ok \ false, must be 0
-10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . -900  ok  \ false, must be 80
0 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 .             \ here division by zero
*the terminal*:47:12: error: Division by zero
0 -50 0 50 >>>tri_mf3.1<<< .
I think it must be:
(the true/false flag must on tos for select as you defined it)
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
    x a c within if
      b x a c x b < select  blend
    else
      0
    then ;
and this one works fine.
-100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0  ok
-50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0  ok
-10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 80  ok
0 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 100  ok
10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 80  ok
50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0  ok
100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0  ok

>
In Gforth (development) SELECT is a primitive which hopefully does not
branch; in that case you have only one branch here.
>
- anton
Ahmed
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Jan 25 * Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines12ahmed
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines2ahmed
31 Jan 25 i`- Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines1ahmed
31 Jan 25 +- Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines1ahmed
31 Jan 25 +- Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines1ahmed
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines6Paul Rubin
1 Feb 25 i+* Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines2ahmed
1 Feb 25 ii`- Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines1ahmed
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines3Anton Ertl
1 Feb 25 i `* Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines2ahmed
1 Feb 25 i  `- SELECT (was: Back & Forth - Co-routines)1Anton Ertl
1 Feb 25 `- Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines1mhx

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal