Re: Stack vs stackless operation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Stack vs stackless operation
De : minforth (at) *nospam* gmx.net (minforth)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 26. Feb 2025, 22:02:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6e767735b491f9835eb598f8d45b52ea@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Really?  ;-)
NT/FORTH (C) 2005  Peter Fälth  Version 1.6-983-824 Compiled on
2017-12-03
Running on Windows NT 6.2 Build 9200
Current directory is e:\Develop\Forth\lxf
: ex {: x y -- :} x @ y @ x ! y ! ;  ok
see ex
  A49E58   40917C  23   C80000   5 normal  EX
  40917C 8B4500                 mov     eax , [ebp]
  40917F 8B00                   mov     eax , [eax]
  409181 8BCB                   mov     ecx , ebx
  409183 8B09                   mov     ecx , [ecx]
  409185 8B5500                 mov     edx , [ebp]
  409188 890A                   mov     [edx] , ecx
  40918A 8903                   mov     [ebx] , eax
  40918C 8B5D04                 mov     ebx , [ebp+4h]
  40918F 8D6D08                 lea     ebp , [ebp+8h]
  409192 C3                     ret     near
 ok
: :=: OVER @ >R  DUP @   ROT !   R> SWAP ! ;  ok
see :=:
  A49E6C   409193  23   C80000   5 normal  :=:
  409193 8B4500                 mov     eax , [ebp]
  409196 8B00                   mov     eax , [eax]
  409198 8BCB                   mov     ecx , ebx
  40919A 8B09                   mov     ecx , [ecx]
  40919C 8B5500                 mov     edx , [ebp]
  40919F 890A                   mov     [edx] , ecx
  4091A1 8903                   mov     [ebx] , eax
  4091A3 8B5D04                 mov     ebx , [ebp+4h]
  4091A6 8D6D08                 lea     ebp , [ebp+8h]
  4091A9 C3                     ret     near
 ok

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * Stack vs stackless operation72LIT
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4minforth
24 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
24 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2minforth
24 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation14Anton Ertl
24 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation13LIT
25 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation12Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation11LIT
25 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9LIT
25 Feb 25 i     +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5minforth
25 Feb 25 i     i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4LIT
25 Feb 25 i     i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3minforth
25 Feb 25 i     i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i     i   `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Gerry Jackson
25 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 i      `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i       `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9dxf
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6dxf
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
26 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4dxf
26 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
26 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2minforth
26 Feb 25 i i    `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
25 Feb 25 i `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Hans Bezemer
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2LIT
25 Feb 25 i`- do...loop (was: Stack vs stackless operation)1Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10LIT
26 Feb 25 i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation9Hans Bezemer
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Hans Bezemer
26 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6LIT
27 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
27 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4LIT
2 Mar 25 i      `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
5 Mar 25 i       `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Hans Bezemer
6 Mar 25 i        `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
25 Feb 25 `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation32LIT
25 Feb 25  +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation10Anton Ertl
25 Feb 25  i+- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation8LIT
26 Feb 25  i +- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6John Ames
26 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5LIT
27 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation4dxf
27 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3LIT
27 Feb 25  i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Hans Bezemer
27 Feb 25  i      `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1LIT
26 Feb 25  +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Waldek Hebisch
26 Feb 25  i`- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation19mhx
26 Feb 25   +- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1minforth
26 Feb 25   +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation16Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25   i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation15Anton Ertl
26 Feb 25   i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Paul Rubin
26 Feb 25   i i+- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1minforth
27 Feb 25   i i`* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5Anton Ertl
27 Feb 25   i i +* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Paul Rubin
27 Feb 25   i i i`- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
27 Feb 25   i i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Gerry Jackson
27 Feb 25   i i  `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1Anton Ertl
28 Feb 25   i `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation7Anton Ertl
28 Feb 25   i  `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation6Paul Rubin
1 Mar 25   i   `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation5Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i    +- Stack caching (: Stack vs stackless operation)1Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i    `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation3Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i     `* Re: Stack vs stackless operation2Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25   i      `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1mhx
27 Feb 25   `- Re: Stack vs stackless operation1mhx

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal