Sujet : Re: "Back & Forth" - Local variables
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 11. Mar 2025, 01:31:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <09b7cbecfcf52d8ade3a47f72bd6975042347369@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/03/2025 11:02 am, dxf wrote:
On 9/01/2025 6:13 am, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
In article <nnd$032b844d$734ee136@776df242e330d1d2>,
Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08-01-2025 17:27, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
...
In assembler, assuming ESI is the interpreter pointer and EBP is the return
stack pointer:
>
CODE CO
XCHG ESI,[EBP]
NEXT,
END-CODE
>
In assembler the return stack is uncluttered.
...
Just to clarify CO (coroutines) and
: ;: >r ;
... So which one is Moore's?
TL;DR From the preceding text apparently it's not - which makes
justifying it somewhat harder.
"Back & Forth" - Local variables
Re: "Back & Forth" - Local variables
